Austin Texas has a governmental agency that tracks life events such as marriages, divorces, births, and deaths.
It's the Bureau of Vital Statistics.
If you want to know if you are married, that is where I'd start.
Thursday, February 8, 2018
CPS Attorneys
Here is a partial list of attorneys that say they do CPS cases.
I know most of them. I would call any of them for a consultation if I had a CPS case.
Remember - if CPS contacts you, IMMEDIATELY hire a CPS attorney to help and guide you on this difficult and tricky process.
I would want to talk to a CPS attorney BEFORE meeting with CPS.
Bobbie Young
Rocky LeAnn Pilgrim
Dennis Slate
George Clevenger
Julie Brock
Jetty Abraham
Eric McFerrin
Les Shireman
Beth Arnold Trostad
Barbara Rice Stadler
Hillary Unger
Allette Williams
Thao Tran
Gigi Oglesby
Susan Solis
Or check out www.avvo.com - best FREE website to locate attorneys in your area.
I know most of them. I would call any of them for a consultation if I had a CPS case.
Remember - if CPS contacts you, IMMEDIATELY hire a CPS attorney to help and guide you on this difficult and tricky process.
I would want to talk to a CPS attorney BEFORE meeting with CPS.
Bobbie Young
Rocky LeAnn Pilgrim
Dennis Slate
George Clevenger
Julie Brock
Jetty Abraham
Eric McFerrin
Les Shireman
Beth Arnold Trostad
Barbara Rice Stadler
Hillary Unger
Allette Williams
Thao Tran
Gigi Oglesby
Susan Solis
Or check out www.avvo.com - best FREE website to locate attorneys in your area.
Unmarried pregnant women
If you are not married and you are pregnant, PLEASE call a family law attorney in your county to talk about your options.
It is so distressing when a woman that just gave birth calls and regrets the decisions she made at the hospital regarding the child's birth certificate.
I am especially upset when the new mom admits dad has drug, alcohol, mental illness or anger management issues. Or, his family members (normally paternal grandmother) is trying to control the entire situation.
If you sign up for any governmental assistance such as Medicaid, food stamps, WIC, etc. you need to read ALL THE FINE PRINT. You are allowing the State of Texas Attorney General's office to file a lawsuit against the bio. dad asking for reimbursement on behalf of Texas taxpayers!
You have no say in this matter once you access free or discounted services provided by the federal or state government.
It's like a snow ball rolling down hill, once it starts you just cannot stop it and it gets bigger and bigger.
If you don't want the Attorney General office involved, then don't access any free services.
I also usually suggest that mom not put bio dad's name on birth certificate or give the child the bio dad's last name.
If dad wants to be involved, make him file a Paternity action and ask a judge to give him parental rights and for the child to have his last name.
If you do it, it's almost impossible to reverse. And, then it's going to cost you thousands of dollars in legal and court costs to try to get a judge to agree with you -- which many judges won't do so you wasted all your time and money.
Of course, only unhappy people call a lawyer. People that are getting along never call me so I recognize that I have a possibly unrealistic view of unmarried young people.
In summary, talk to a lawyer NOW and not later.
It is so distressing when a woman that just gave birth calls and regrets the decisions she made at the hospital regarding the child's birth certificate.
I am especially upset when the new mom admits dad has drug, alcohol, mental illness or anger management issues. Or, his family members (normally paternal grandmother) is trying to control the entire situation.
If you sign up for any governmental assistance such as Medicaid, food stamps, WIC, etc. you need to read ALL THE FINE PRINT. You are allowing the State of Texas Attorney General's office to file a lawsuit against the bio. dad asking for reimbursement on behalf of Texas taxpayers!
You have no say in this matter once you access free or discounted services provided by the federal or state government.
It's like a snow ball rolling down hill, once it starts you just cannot stop it and it gets bigger and bigger.
If you don't want the Attorney General office involved, then don't access any free services.
I also usually suggest that mom not put bio dad's name on birth certificate or give the child the bio dad's last name.
If dad wants to be involved, make him file a Paternity action and ask a judge to give him parental rights and for the child to have his last name.
If you do it, it's almost impossible to reverse. And, then it's going to cost you thousands of dollars in legal and court costs to try to get a judge to agree with you -- which many judges won't do so you wasted all your time and money.
Of course, only unhappy people call a lawyer. People that are getting along never call me so I recognize that I have a possibly unrealistic view of unmarried young people.
In summary, talk to a lawyer NOW and not later.
Can someone under 18 get married in Texas?
Can a teen-ager get married in Texas?
There is a new Texas law effective September, 2017 that anyone under the age of 18 cannot marry.
The only exception is a judge can emancipate the teen-ager (between the ages of 16-18) and then the newly emancipated person can marry.
No longer can parents just sign and agree to the marriage - that is now GONE.
If you are unhappy, contact your Texas legislature since they changed the law effective September 2017.
If enough people complain, then the legislature can re-visit this law when they meet again in 2019.
Emancipation is not cheap or easy. It will definitely depend on the judge. Some judges won't do it. Of course, what makes it truly difficult is that the teen-ager needs to be financially self reliant. I don't know of any 16 year olds that support themselves 100%.
But the law is new so perhaps judges will be more lenient if they know that the child intends to marry as soon as they are emancipated.
Lots of parents and teens post regarding this question and I hope this explains it clearly and simply.
It's the current law and we are struck with it until the legislature changes the law.
Wednesday, January 3, 2018
7 Tips to Transform Disagreements for 2018
Below is an article that originally appeared in an ACR publication written by Kate Stewart.
Enjoy!
Article for 2018 on family law from Texas Lawyer Magazine
Now is the time for family lawyers and their clients to begin preparing for several revisions to the Texas Family Code that are set to take effect in 2018. The biggest, most-scrutinized change involves how courts will handle child support, which is almost always a big point of contention.
In nearly every family law case, the noncustodial parent, or “obligor,” feels like they are paying too much child support, while the custodial parent, or “obligee,” believes they are not receiving a sufficient amount to raise their child.
In Texas, outside of an agreement otherwise, Chapter 154 of the Texas Family Code (TFC) governs the amount of child support that the nonprimary must pay the custodial parent each month.
To determine the monthly payment, barring any special needs or other extenuating circumstances involving the child, the code requires that the court first calculate the noncustodial parent’s monthly net resources (monthly income after taxes).
Based on that amount and number of children, a certain percentage is deducted from the obligor’s monthly net resources and paid to the custodial parent. The percentage varies depending on the number of children, with a deduction ceiling of 40 percent for all cases involving five or more children.
The code also requires the court to order the noncustodial parent to provide medical coverage for the child at a reasonable cost (TFC Section 154.181). The cost of the child’s health insurance premium is deducted from the obligor’s monthly net income to determine the monthly net resources discussed above.
Significant 2018 Changes
Effective Sept. 1, 2018, the TFC will require courts to begin ordering obligors to also cover their child’s dental insurance at a reasonable cost in addition to health insurance. The dental premium cost will be deducted from the obligor’s monthly net resources for child support calculation purposes in the exact same manner as health insurance premium costs.
The biggest change taking effect on the same date is the court’s ability to modify child support when the parents reach an agreement on a payment amount that does not follow TFC guidelines.
Currently, TFC Section 154.401 holds that no matter if an agreement has been reached on an amount that deviates from the guidelines, the court can modify a child support order under three scenarios:
• The circumstances of the child or a person affected by the order have materially and substantially changed since the original order.
• The parties have reached a mediated or collaborative law settlement agreement.
• Within three years of the original order being rendered or last modified, the monthly amount of child support under the order differs either 20 percent or $100 from the amount that would be awarded in accordance with the TFC child support guidelines.
Once the new rules take effect next September, if divorcing parties agree to an order under which the amount of child support differs from what would have been awarded in accordance with TFC guidelines, then the court may modify the order only if the circumstances of the child or person affected by the order have materially and substantially changed since the date the order was rendered.
Statewide Impact
Plain and simple, this change will affect family law cases and child support payments statewide. By restricting the ability of courts to modify child support to a material and substantial change only, custodial parents who agree to deviate from TFC guidelines, absent a proven material and substantial change to current circumstances, will not have the luxury of simply waiting three years and hoping for an increase in the obligor’s monthly net resources.
Since it is very common for an individual’s employment experience to increase over a three-year span and, in turn, create a spike in income, this change precludes the custodial parent from simply presenting those facts to modify support.
Custodial parents who utilize the services of the attorney general in a Title IV-D family case are not restricted by the above change to modify support at any time, absent a showing of material and substantial change, if the order does not provide health care coverage or dental care coverage.
Considering that calculating dental care coverage is not required until next September, there likely will be a massive increase in child support modifications in Title IV-D cases once the new rules are implemented.
Looking Ahead
These changes not only will affect potential settlements between parents or conservators, but also the strategies and practices of every family law attorney practicing in the Lone Star State. Texas lawyers will soon have to advise their clients of the possible effects of deviating from TFC guidelines and the significant obstacles to modifying child support in the future.
Another consideration involves the possibility of previously amicable divorcing parties becoming less so due to them being forced to adhere to the new guidelines, which could create an increase in docket congestion and the amount of tax dollars spent by each county.
The final impact of these new rules will not be truly realized until after they’re implemented, but it is crucial for all family lawyers to know the details prior to Sept. 1, 2018.
This article was written by - Family law attorney Kris Balekian Hayes is the founder and president of Dallas-based Balekian Hayes. She has represented clients in Texas, Georgia and Oklahoma in all areas of family law, including contested divorces, child possession and child support disputes, and mediation proceedings. She can be reached at kris@bh-pllc.com.
Friday, December 8, 2017
Interesting Case re: mediation out of Amarillo Texas
Highsmith v. Highsmith, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 9213 (Texas. App. - Amarillo on September 28, 2017) (Cause No. 07-15-000407-CV)
Husband and Wife were contemplating divorce. They entered into a pre-suit Mediated Settlement Agreement. Husband eventually filed for divorce. Wife signed a Waiver of Service but did NOT waiver notice of hearings). BUT then Wife filed an Answer with the Court. Husband appeared without any notice to Wife and obtained approval of the settlement agreement and finalized divorce.
After divorce was granted, Wife hired an attorney. Trial court denied her motion to set aside the rendition and revoke the settlement agreement.
Court of Appeals thought the agreement did not comply with Family Code governing mediated settlement agreements since it was done PRIOR to the lawsuit being filed. BUT the Court felt the MSA was enforceable as a contract but then Wife could object using contract defenses and try to revoke it.
Court of Appeals held that Wife did not waive notice of hearings and filed an original Answer.
Wife had a fundamental right to receive notice of all hearings.
So Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Motto of this finding -
Though not in Houston (it was Amarillo) it addresses an issue that I have been concerned about for quite some time.
If a couple comes to mediate BEFORE filing a lawsuit then either party can try to later revoke it for a variety of reasons.
So...file lawsuit then mediate. That would make it much harder to try to wiggle out of a mediated settlement agreement.
Husband and Wife were contemplating divorce. They entered into a pre-suit Mediated Settlement Agreement. Husband eventually filed for divorce. Wife signed a Waiver of Service but did NOT waiver notice of hearings). BUT then Wife filed an Answer with the Court. Husband appeared without any notice to Wife and obtained approval of the settlement agreement and finalized divorce.
After divorce was granted, Wife hired an attorney. Trial court denied her motion to set aside the rendition and revoke the settlement agreement.
Court of Appeals thought the agreement did not comply with Family Code governing mediated settlement agreements since it was done PRIOR to the lawsuit being filed. BUT the Court felt the MSA was enforceable as a contract but then Wife could object using contract defenses and try to revoke it.
Court of Appeals held that Wife did not waive notice of hearings and filed an original Answer.
Wife had a fundamental right to receive notice of all hearings.
So Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Motto of this finding -
Though not in Houston (it was Amarillo) it addresses an issue that I have been concerned about for quite some time.
If a couple comes to mediate BEFORE filing a lawsuit then either party can try to later revoke it for a variety of reasons.
So...file lawsuit then mediate. That would make it much harder to try to wiggle out of a mediated settlement agreement.
Sunday, December 3, 2017
Free advice is sometimes not appreciated
I had a lady post on avvo.com a question about adopting children after having her parental rights terminated approx. 3 years ago for meth drug abuse.
And, she said that she just got out of jail for violating the terms of her probation and claims to currently be in rehab.
Perhaps I'm just old and crusty - but the above facts don't sound like any Harris County judge would allow her to adopt new children.
She did not like the advice I offered for FREE on a Sunday evening.
Oh well...it was worth what she paid -- nothing!
If an attorney takes the time to answer your numerous questions at least you could say thanks and look elsewhere for what you want to hear.
Being rude and nasty is just inappropriate.
And, she said that she just got out of jail for violating the terms of her probation and claims to currently be in rehab.
Perhaps I'm just old and crusty - but the above facts don't sound like any Harris County judge would allow her to adopt new children.
She did not like the advice I offered for FREE on a Sunday evening.
Oh well...it was worth what she paid -- nothing!
If an attorney takes the time to answer your numerous questions at least you could say thanks and look elsewhere for what you want to hear.
Being rude and nasty is just inappropriate.
My e-card from a couple of years ago.
Click on link to open up my e-card holiday card.
http://familylaw4u.com/ecard/
http://familylaw4u.com/ecard/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)